Monday, May 10, 2004
The Simkanin Trial and the Courts
Courtesy of Angela Stark and the Irwin Schiff News - this message from Irwin:
I noticed e-mails to the ZIF group seeking to explain the travesty of Justice in connection with Simkanin's conviction because of the alleged administrative nature of our courts and other considerations. All this does is provide a kind of rationalization for the criminal conduct of our alleged courts. All legitimate administrative tribunals or admiralty courts attempt to find the truth in the matter before the court, board, or tribunal. If the court or tribunal is not trying to find the truth in the matter before it, then it is not even a court or tribunal, but
is only masquerading as such. It is a court in name only. and we stop trying to dignify such courts by attempting to rationalize some basis that allows them to lie about the law to juries as Judge McBryde did.
First of all if Simkanin was charged with violating Code Section 7202: that should have been immediately challenged by way of a motion to dismiss, since 7202 does not allege an offense. It only makes it a crime to collect,
account for, and pay over any tax if one is required to do those things, but the statute does not refer persons to any statute that requires anybody to do any of those things. The only law that might apply to withholding is section 3102 and it only says (once) that such taxes shall be collected and the rest of the references (four) state that employers may deduct. The reference to "shall" is the equivalent of may for reasons that I cover in all of my books. Thus there is no law that states that employers are required to deduct. There are a number of reasons for this, not the least of which is that it would violate the XIII Amendment which bars involuntary servitude.
So when McBryde told the jury that he made a legal determination that during the years in question, Arrow Plastics had a legal duty to collect Social Security, Medicare and FICA taxes etc. etc. etc., he lied on various
grounds! First of all, no law imposed such a legal duty, and McBryde had no authority to determine that persons have a legal duty to do something that no law requires them to do. So Judge McBryde lied about the law, and Simkanin was framed in a forum that was masquerading as a court, and people should stop trying to justify the frame-up by rationalizing it had something to do with the nature of our court system or some other reason.
Irwin Schiff
www.paynoincometax.com
I noticed e-mails to the ZIF group seeking to explain the travesty of Justice in connection with Simkanin's conviction because of the alleged administrative nature of our courts and other considerations. All this does is provide a kind of rationalization for the criminal conduct of our alleged courts. All legitimate administrative tribunals or admiralty courts attempt to find the truth in the matter before the court, board, or tribunal. If the court or tribunal is not trying to find the truth in the matter before it, then it is not even a court or tribunal, but
is only masquerading as such. It is a court in name only. and we stop trying to dignify such courts by attempting to rationalize some basis that allows them to lie about the law to juries as Judge McBryde did.
First of all if Simkanin was charged with violating Code Section 7202: that should have been immediately challenged by way of a motion to dismiss, since 7202 does not allege an offense. It only makes it a crime to collect,
account for, and pay over any tax if one is required to do those things, but the statute does not refer persons to any statute that requires anybody to do any of those things. The only law that might apply to withholding is section 3102 and it only says (once) that such taxes shall be collected and the rest of the references (four) state that employers may deduct. The reference to "shall" is the equivalent of may for reasons that I cover in all of my books. Thus there is no law that states that employers are required to deduct. There are a number of reasons for this, not the least of which is that it would violate the XIII Amendment which bars involuntary servitude.
So when McBryde told the jury that he made a legal determination that during the years in question, Arrow Plastics had a legal duty to collect Social Security, Medicare and FICA taxes etc. etc. etc., he lied on various
grounds! First of all, no law imposed such a legal duty, and McBryde had no authority to determine that persons have a legal duty to do something that no law requires them to do. So Judge McBryde lied about the law, and Simkanin was framed in a forum that was masquerading as a court, and people should stop trying to justify the frame-up by rationalizing it had something to do with the nature of our court system or some other reason.
Irwin Schiff
www.paynoincometax.com
Saturday, May 01, 2004
Dick Simkanin - Political Prisoner
Dick "Richard M." Simkanin has been sentenced to 84 months (7 years).
The combined sentences of a Bank Robber and a Wife Beating Firearms dealer were less than 1/2 of that!
But, of course, a bank robber is no problem; THEY can always print more "money".
And, a wife beater is not a threat to THEM. He's only a threat to the people.
To help with the cost of Dick's Appeal, or just to send Dick a note go to Dick's web site for address information.
The combined sentences of a Bank Robber and a Wife Beating Firearms dealer were less than 1/2 of that!
But, of course, a bank robber is no problem; THEY can always print more "money".
And, a wife beater is not a threat to THEM. He's only a threat to the people.
To help with the cost of Dick's Appeal, or just to send Dick a note go to Dick's web site for address information.
